CIEEM publishes Briefing Paper on what Part 3 of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill means for Developers and Constructors
CIEEM has published its Briefing Paper on what Part 3 of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill means for Developers and Constructors. This briefing comes from conversations with developers and constructions companies, where it is clear that some are starting to realise the potential ramifications this Bill will have for the sector. We have produced this briefing note to summarise the adverse implications of the proposals as contained in the Bill at the end of July 2025.
We are deeply concerned about the potential irreparable harm to vulnerable habitats and species and the loss of nature from people’s doorsteps. But we are also concerned that Part 3 of the Bill will not deliver the benefits for developers that have been promised and will place construction companies in an invidious position as they seek to deliver the development. Our primary concerns are:
1. Greater complexity in the planning system for the foreseeable future
2. Reduction of private investment in, and availability of, off-site mitigation solutions
3. Reputational damage, animal welfare concerns and stakeholder resistance
4. Potential breach of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) with the European Union
The UK Government describes Part 3 of the Planning and Infrastructure Bill as a win-win for nature and development. The suggestion that it is a win for nature has already been discredited by the Office for Environmental Protection and a number of KC opinions. In our view, Part 3 does not deliver a win for developers either. Instead, it creates uncertainty, complexity, and financial and reputational risk.
See more of our activities on the Planning and Infrastructure Bill.